Talk:HD 162826

Jupiter-like probability

The primary reference [1] does explain the probability more exactly: "For a Jupiter mass planet in a Jupiter-like (12 yr) circular orbit, we estimate a 35% probability that such a planet is present based on the non-detection from our RV data." Alas, I have no idea what this really means - obviously there is not really a 35% chance for there to be a planet in that precise orbit. Expansion in this regard would be welcome. Wnt (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Starbox help needed

In trying to clean up a refererence with a typo I somehow deleted a key piece of code in the star box template or data. Does anyone know how to fix this? My apologies. Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's an error you yourself introduced into the infobox, so you could revert your own edit. (Or I think you can, I haven't used the mobile editor, which you seem to be using. I will note that many errors in pages on Wikipedia seem to be caused by the mobile editor. ) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HD 162826. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512132739/http://www.as.utexas.edu/~ivan/sun_siblings.pdf to http://www.as.utexas.edu/~ivan/sun_siblings.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]